Journal Of Hadith Studies <p align="justify"><img src="/public/site/images/admin/banner-2.jpg" alt="" width="100%"></p> <p align="justify">Journal of Hadith Studies is a refereed academic journal published biannually by Ulum Hadith Research Centre in collaboration with Faculty of Quranic and Sunnah Studies, USIM. The Journal aims to provide an active forum for academicians and researchers to share their findings and new ideas for a better understanding of hadith. It encourages interdisciplinary investigation, critical reassessment on hadith and seeks to foster innovatory research. The Journal welcomes research paper with salient methodological approaches related to the hadith studies.&nbsp;</p> <p>We encourage the author to submit manuscript (as a Microsoft Word file) using our online system. We also accept submission through email. Send article to: <a href="" target="_blank" rel="noopener"></a>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p>eISSN: 2550-1448</p> en-US Journal Of Hadith Studies <p>© Copyright 2019 - Journal Of Hadith Studies (eISSN: 2550-1448) | Ulum Hadith Research Centre</p> ASSESSING JUYNBOLL’S THEORY: THE CASE OF ABŪ HURAYRA IN THE MUWAṬṬA’ OF MĀLIK <p><em>Joseph Schacht (d.1969) argued that the further back the isnād of a ḥadīth goes, the more assure we should be of its fabrication and the later date that this fabrication occurred. Furthermore, Gautier Juynboll (d.2010) argued that the more people transmit a ḥadīth from a scholar the more historicity that moment has. For example, if a great amount of people narrated a ḥadīth from a transmitter the more attestation there is that the ḥadīth actually existed at the time. He concludes that this proves this ḥadīth must have been forged at some earlier date. He argues that the surge of Abū Hurayra’s traditions occurs in the period of Mālik b. Anas (d.179AH/796CE) and that Zuhrī (d.124AH/741CE) or later figures linked with him may have played a rule in the promulgation of Abū Hurayra's reports. This paper will investigate whether there are other reports which corroborate the reports of Abū Hurayra through other isnāds. This discussion also leads to investigate these reports of Abū Hurayra in the Muwaṭṭa’ which stem from Mālik and Zuhrī specifically. </em></p> Usman Ghani Copyright (c) 2020 2020-06-30 2020-06-30 1 13 ANALISIS KRITIKAN AL-DHAHABĪ TERHADAP IBN ḤIBBĀN DALAM MIZAN AL-IʻTIDAL <p><em>The culture of criticising amongst hadith scholars often revolves around the debate on ‘ilm al-jarh wa al-ta‘dil. The criticism is exemplified in the works penned by hadith scholars in assessing the narrators in the sanad mentioned in any particular hadith in which the latter are evaluated as thiqah or daif and others. There are varrying views pertaining to criticism against the narrators particularly when evaluating them from the view point of al-jarh wa al-ta‘dil. These differences in view may cause confusion in determining the status of a particular hadith in light of acceptance and rejection of the hadith. In this context, the evaluation of Ibn Hibban who is regarded as mutashaddid in his tajrih exercize upon the narrators had garnered criticism from al-Dhahabi who views that the former's eveluation; upon the latter's scrutiny was found to be imprecise. Therefore, this article intends to analyze the criticism levelled by al-Dhahabi against Ibn Hibban in his work al-Mizan al-I‘tidal. This research applied two main methods, namely data collection and data analysis. Data collection was conducted via library research and thereafter analyzed through inductive and deductive methods as well as al-jarh wa al-ta‘dil methods. Research findings show that al-Dhahabi's criticism against Ibn Hibban in al-Mizan al-I‘tidal consists of two types of criticism, firstly criticism against the tajrih of Ibn Hibban on the the narrators; secondly, criticism on the mistakes made by Ibn Hibban in presenting the biographies of the narrators. This research further proves that Ibn Hibban was a scholar who was mutashaddid in exercizing tajrih on the narrators; as well as highlights the prominence of both al-Dhahabi and Ibn Hibban as outstanding critics of narrators of their time.</em></p> <p><em>&nbsp;</em></p> Copyright (c) 2020 2020-06-30 2020-06-30 14 30 العوامل لأوهام الرواة في روايات السيرة النبوية <p><em>The one who looks at the books of hadith sciences will find that the hadith scholars have mentioned several reasons for the contradiction between the hadiths. They said that among these reasons is the mistake of narrators. However, when they elaborate this reason, they did not detail the factors that make the narrators mistaken in their narratives. Nor did they focus their research on the narrations of the Prophet’s biography. This research attempts to focus on the narrations of the Prophet's biography to extract these factors. This is done by adapting the inductive and critical analytical method. After research, it became clear that the narrators’ mistakes are among the most important reasons for the contradiction between the narrations of the Prophet’s biography and that these mistakes also have factors including similarities in the subject of the narrations.</em></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Muhamad Rozaimi bin Ramle Ahmad Kamil bin Jamilin Copyright (c) 2020 2020-06-30 2020-06-30 31 40 إماطة الحائل عن بناء الفضائل على الضعيف من حديث صاحب أفضل الشمائل <p><em>Speaking about the ruling on working with weak hadiths in virtues and provisions remains one of the issues raised in the scientific and advocacy arena. It has views differed surprisingly, so we see many preachers and students of science narrate any hadith has come and went because they are not aware of the sayings of scholars in this serious subject without corroborating the validity of what is being told, on the pretext that the weak hadith is desirable to work in the virtues without distinguishing between the weak and Abandoned and even Forged&nbsp; Hadith, and in return, find some people attributed to the science to prevent the work of the weak conversation at all, without distinction also between the weak and the easy little between the severe and the weak, and even considered it as the topic completely, and therefore the importance of this research is represented in our endeavor to gather the parties to the issue, and liberate a place Conflict and clarification of what is right, aiming to do so to shed more light on the necessity of reviving the Sunnah, taking into account its true and good narrations, as long as it can. The research in delivering its proposal follows the analytical inductive approach by tracing the texts of scholars specializing in this field and mentioning their sayings, directions and guides, and deciding what is most likely to be explained by evidence. In the result, the research will reach the assertion of the perfection and beauty of this religion in its legislation and highlighting the reserves of its scholars in order to preserve its purity and serenity away from extremism and leniency. The research consists of an introduction, three topics, and a conclusion.</em></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Syed Mohammad Chaedar Syed Abdurrahman Ali Yahya Copyright (c) 2020 2020-06-30 2020-06-30 41 63 معاملة النصارى في ضوء السيرة النبوية، نصارى نجران نموذجا <p><em>Islam is a religion came to bring people from darkness to light However, the principle of compulsion in religion is one of the basic principles in Islam. The country is not without Muslim countries of non-Muslims of different religions, especially the Christians, and hence the problem arises in the knowledge of how best to deal with the perception that they are the people of the book. This research aims to know how to deal with the Prophet peace be upon him through his dealings with the Christians Najran in his reign peace be upon him. As well as aims to reveal the charters that took place between the Prophet and the Christians of Najran. This research was followed by an inductive analytical method through induction and analysis of texts from modern and biographies. The results found that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) used to deal with them and give them the right to live, equality, and so on. This indicates that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) was greedy to invite them into Islam. And also because of this policy prevailed security and stability in the region and the safest of the safest of the Christians because of the wisdom of the Prophet peace be upon him. This research should be used by students of science and Islamic countries in their dealings with Christians and other Muslims.</em></p> Muhammad Ikram bin Abu Hassan Copyright (c) 2020 2020-06-30 2020-06-30 63 77