PERANAN SAINS MODEN DALAM INTERAKSI TEKS HADIS: PENELITIAN TERHADAP HADIS BERKAITAN PENCIPTAAN JANIN MANUSIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33102/johs.v1i1.4Abstract
Religio-scientific interaction towards hadith of the Prophet Muhammad has been clearly traced in the early Muslim scholar’s literatures, specifically form the third century of Hijri. Attention in the respected disciplines was significantly growing throughout the centuries as it was observed from literatures concerning to interpretation of the meaning of hadith in ‘kutub al-syūrūh’ from the fourth until tenth centuries of Hijri. However, the rapid establishment of scientific knowledge sparks stimulating conscience and argues against the result of earlier assimilation of the science and the hadith. Therefore this article addresses the issue by examining one of the most heated debate in this disciplines, which is the creation of the human foetus based on the latest scientific facts in the topic. The study employed qualitative method in which comparative analysis will be used as its main tools of investigation. In conclusion, this study argues for the need to revise the intricate interactions between the hadith and scientific exploration as some of the early understanding of Muslim scholars in the topic appear as not in accordance with the modern scientific facts. However some aspects of the hadith in this topic shows the inability of the modern science as the modern facts was foretold by the hadith more than fourteen thousands years ago.Downloads
References
Al-‘AsqalÄnÄ«, Ahmad bin ‘Ali, (1937). Fath al-BÄrÄ«, DÄr al-Ma’rifah.
Al-BÄr, Muhammad ‘Ali, (1983). Khalq al-InsÄn bayna al-Ṭib wa al-QurÄn, Arab Saudi: al-DÄr al-Sa’udiyyah.
Al-BukhÄrÄ«, Muhammad bin Ismail, (1422). á¹¢aḥīḥ al-BukhÄrÄ«, DÄr al-Ṭūq al-NajÄṯ.
Al-NawawÄ«, Yahya bin Syaraf, (1932). al-MinhÄj Syaraḥ á¹¢aḥīḥ Muslim bin ḤajjÄj, Beirut: DÄr Ihya’ al-TurÄth al-‘Arabiy.
Al-QÄrÄ«, Mula ‘Ali, (2002). MirqÄt al-MafÄtīḥ, Beirut: DÄr al-Fikr.
Ibnu al-AthÄ«r, (1979). al-NihÄyah fi GharÄ«b al-ḤadÄ«th wa al-Ä€thÄr, Beirut: al-Maktabah al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Ibnu Kathir. (1999).TafsÄ«r al-QurÄn al-‘AẓhÄ«m, DÄr Ṭībah.
Ibnu Qayyim al-Jawziyyah, al-TibyÄn fi AymÄn al-QurÄn, DÄr ‘Ālam al-FawÄid.
Ibnu Qutaybah, ‘Abdullah bin Muslim, (1999). Ta’wīl Mukhtalif al-Ḥadīth, Beirut: al-Maktab al-Islamiy.
‘IyÄḠbin MÅ«sa al-YaḥṣubÄ«, (1998). IkmÄl al-Mu’lim bi Fawaid Muslim, Mansurah: DÄr al-Wafa’.
Joseph Needam, A Histroy of Embroyology, Second edition
Mohd Yusuf Ismail, (2016). al-TafsÄ«r al-‘IlmÄ« li al-AhÄdÄ«th al-Nabawiyyah: Dirasah Ta’ṣīliyyah Naqdiyyah, Tesis Ph.D, University of Jordan, Amman.
Muslim bin al-HajjÄj (t.t.). á¹¢aḥīḥ Muslim, Beirut: DÄr Ihya’ al-TurÄth al-‘Arabiy.
Omar Abdul Rahmen, Does the Quran Plagiarise Ancient Greek Embryology: A Review, https://islampapers.com
T.W. Sadler, (2012). Langman’s Medical Embryology, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 12th ed.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
The copyright of this article will be vested to author(s) and granted the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, unless otherwise stated.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
