Polemik Istighathah Dengan Nabi Saw Setelah Kewafatan Baginda: Penilaian Dan Ulasan Terhadap Hadis Mālik Al-Dār
The Polemics of Istighāthah with the Prophet SAW After His Passing: A Critical Assessment of the Ḥadīth of Mālik al-Dār
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33102/johs.v11i1.439Keywords:
Istighāthah, Tawassul, Polemic, Takhrij, Matn AnalysisAbstract
The practice of istighāthah with the Prophet Muhammad PBUH after his passing represents a form of tawassul that has long been the subject of contradictory interpretations among scholars. Some permit it, provided that it is accompanied by the conviction that only Allah SWT possesses the power to grant benefit or harm, while others regard it as a form of shirk, as it resembles seeking aid from beings other than Allah in matters ghaibiyyāt. The hadith of Mālik al-Dār is often cited as the primary evidence by those who advocate the permissibility of this practice. The narration describes a man who approached the Prophet’s grave during the caliphate of ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb RA to seek rain. However, the authenticity of its sanad and the understanding of its matn have generated divergent interpretations among scholars. Some consider its chain sound and indicative of the permissibility of istighāthah, whereas others question the accuracy of its transmission and the contextual implications of the event. These differences have led to scholarly polemics and public confusion, particularly when discussions are influenced by sectarian and ideological sentiments. Therefore, this study aims to re-evaluate the hadith objectively and academically, providing a more balanced understanding grounded in the authentic disciplines of hadith and Islamic theology. A qualitative library based methodology is employed, utilizing the methods of takhrīj al-hadīth, sanad and matn analysis, and a comparative evaluation of scholarly perspectives from various disciplines. The data are analyzed thematically and critically to identify the strengths of arguments and the contextual factors shaping interpretive differences. The findings are expected to offer a balanced and authoritative assessment of the hadith of Mālik al-Dār, thereby clarifying the true position of istighāthah within the framework of sound Islamic creed. This study also contributes to contemporary hadith scholarship by emphasizing the importance of critical and interdisciplinary analysis in addressing religious issues of polemical nature.
Downloads
References
‘A. al-R. al-Sa‘dī (t.t.). Taysīr al-Karīm al-Raḥmān. Jeddah: Cetakan khas.
‘A. al-Razzāq al-Ṣan‘ānī (1403H). al-Muṣannaf. India: al-Majlis al-‘Ilmī.
‘A. bin ‘A. al-Kāfī al-Subkī (2008). Shifā’ al-Saqām fī Ziyārah Khayr al-Anām. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
‘A. bin al-Ḥ. Ibn ‘Asākir (1995). Tārīkh Dimashq. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
‘A. bin M. Ibn Abī Ḥātim (1952). al-Jarḥ wa al-Ta‘dīl. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī.
‘A. bin M. Ibn Qutaybah al-Dīnawarī (1992). al-Ma‘ārif. Kaherah: al-Hay’ah al-Miṣriyyah al-‘Āmmah li al-Kitāb.
‘U. bin Shabbah (1979). Tārīkh al-Madīnah. Jeddah: Cetakan khas.
A. B. al-Ḥiṣnī (t.t.). Daf‘ Shubah man Shabbahah wa Tamarrad. Kaherah: al-Maktabah al-Azhariyyah al-Islāmiyyah.
A. B. Ibn Abī Shaybah (1409H). al-Muṣannaf. Riyadh: Maktabah al-Rushd.
A. B. Ibn Abī Shaybah (1989). al-Muṣannaf fī al-Aḥādīth wa al-Āthār. Riyadh: Maktabah al-Rushd.
A. bin A. Ibn Abī Khaythamah (2006). Tārīkh Ibn Abī Khaythamah. Kaherah: al-Fārūq al-Ḥadīthah li al-Ṭibā‘ah wa al-Nashr.
A. bin al-Ḥ. al-Bayhaqī (1988). Dalā’il al-Nubuwwah wa Ma‘rifat Aḥwāl Ṣāḥib al-Sharī‘ah. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
A. bin Ḥ. Ibn Ḥajar al-Haytamī (2000). al-Jawhar al-Munẓam fī Ziyārah al-Qabr al-Sharīf al-Nabawī. Kaherah: Maktabah Madbūlī.
A. bin Ḥanbal (1983). Faḍā’il al-Ṣaḥābah. Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risālah.
A. bin Ḥanbal (2001). al-Musnad. Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risālah.
A. bin Ḥanbal (2009). al-Jāmi‘ li ‘Ulūm al-Imām Aḥmad: al-Rijāl. Beirut: Dār al-Falāḥ li al-Baḥth al-‘Ilmī.
A.I. Sholihin (2013). Buku Pintar Ekonomi Syariah. Indonesia: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
A.S. Rosman, Z. Haron, J. Junaidi, F.M. Yusuf, M.S.Y. Abdullah, Z. Mashrom (2018). Tawassul dan Istighāthah dengan Nabi Muḥammad dalam Amalan Mawlid Berzanji. Al-Qanatir: International Journal of Islamic Studies, 12(2). Retrieved from: https://al-qanatir.com/aq/article/view/161
A.Y. Al-Hasan (2006). Transfer of Islamic Science to the West. Manchester: FSTC Limited.
AM Yusoff, M Hashim, ARH Obeid (2017). At-Tafsir as-Sufi al-Isyari fi A’amal al-Qulub: Dirasah Naqdiyyah fi al-Bahril Madid. Journal of Ma’alim al-Quran wa al-Sunnah, 8(9), 125-156. Retrieved from: http://jmqs.usim.edu.my/index.php /jmqs/article/view/64
I. Muṣṭafā, A. al-Zayyāt, Ḥ. ‘Abd al-Qādir, M. al-Najjār (t.t.). al-Mu‘jam al-Wasīṭ. Mesir: Dār al-Da‘wah.
K. bin ‘A. al-Khalīlī (1989). al-Irshād fī Ma‘rifat ‘Ulamā’ al-Ḥadīth. Riyadh: Maktabah al-Rushd.
M Hashim, AM Yusoff, ARH Obeid (2018). At-Tafsir as-Sufi al-Isyari fi Bidayah as-Salikin: Dirasah Naqdiyyah fi Ruhil Bayan lil Burusawi , Journal of Ma’alim al-Quran wa al-Sunnah, 11(12), 36-62. Retrieved from: http://jmqs.usim.edu.my/index.php/jmqs/ article/view/72
M. al-Ṭ. Ibn ‘Āshūr (1984). al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr. Tunisia: Dār al-Tūnisiyyah li al-Nashr.
M. bin I. al-Bukhārī (2001). Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Beirut: Dār Ṭawq al-Najāh.
M. bin I. al-Bukhārī (t.t.). al-Tārīkh al-Kabīr. Hyderabad: Dā’irat al-Ma‘ārif al-‘Uthmāniyyah.
M. bin M. al-Zabīdī (t.t.). Tāj al-‘Arūs min Jawāhir al-Qāmūs. Mesir: Dār al-Hidāyah.
M. bin Y. Ibn Mājah al-Qazwīnī (t.t.). Sunan Ibn Mājah. Mesir: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Kutub al-‘Arabiyyah.
S. al-D. al-Dhahabī (1963). Mīzān al-I‘tidāl fī Naqd al-Rijāl. Beirut: Dār al-Ma‘rifah.
W. al-Zuḥaylī (1418H). al-Tafsīr al-Munīr. Damsyik: Dār al-Fikr al-Mu‘āṣir.
Y. bin S. al-Fasawī (1981). al-Ma‘rifah wa al-Tārīkh. Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risālah.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright of this article will be vested to author(s) and granted the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, unless otherwise stated.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

