Kempen ‘Semak Ḥadīth Sebelum Sebar’ Antara Tradisi Ahli Ḥadīth Dan Dakyah ‘Wahabi’
The Campaign 'Check the Ḥadīth Before Spreading’: Between the Tradition of Ḥadīth Scholars and 'Wahabi' Propaganda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33102/johs.v8i2.243Keywords:
Ḥadīth, Campaign, Methodology, Status, WahabiAbstract
The Noble Qur'an and ḥadīth are two main sources of revelation that serve as crucial pillars for the Islamic faith. However, there are several significant differences between these two sources of revelation. The most notable difference lies in terms of thubūt (the authenticity of the transmission of the revelation to its source). Unlike the Noble Qur'an, which has reached the Muslim community through mutawātir (mass-transmitted) chains of narration, the majority of ḥadīth have been transmitted to Muslims through āḥād (singularly transmitted) chains, which are open to criticism regarding their authenticity (ṣādiq) or falsehood (kāzib) in their transmission to the original source, the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). Scholars from various fields, such as muḥaddithūn (ḥadīth scholars), fuqahā’ (jurists), and uṣūliyyūn (theologians), have laid down various criteria for evaluating the acceptance of a ḥadīth (maqbūl). If a ḥadīth fails to meet any of the established criteria, it is deemed rejected (mardūd). Given the reality that a ḥadīth could be true or false in its attribution to the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), many contemporary ḥadīth researchers in Malaysia have launched the campaign 'Check the Ḥadīth Before Spreading.' On the surface, this campaign is commendable and in line with the tradition of ḥadīth scholars who have always emphasized the importance of verifying the status of ḥadīth before accepting or disseminating them. However, there are some who seemingly do not support this campaign and even argue that it is a 'Wahabi' propaganda in Malaysia, attempting to surpass the wisdom of past ḥadīth scholars who never engaged in such a campaign. This reaction has sparked controversy within the discourse of contemporary ḥadīth studies in Malaysia. This paper aims to unravel these issues and shed light on the status of this campaign according to the principles and methodologies of knowledge within the tradition of Islamic ḥadīth studies.
Downloads
References
Al-Qurān al-Karīm
‘Īdū, M.‘Ī. (2016), Nasy`at ‘Ilm al-Muṣṭalaḥ wa al-Ḥad al-Fāṣil bayn al-Mutaqaddimīn wa al-Mutaakhirīn, c.1, al-Urdun: al-Arwiqah li al-Dirāsāt.
Abū ‘Awānah, Y. I. (2014), al-Musnad al-Ṣaḥīḥ al-Mukharraj ‘ala Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, Taḥqīq: Farīq min al-bāḥithīn, c.1, al-Madīnah: al-Jāmi’ah al-Islāmiyyah.
Abū ‘Imārah, M. M. (2010), Aḍwā’ ‘ala al-Madāris Ḥadīthiyyah: al-Nasy`ah wa al-Taṭawwur, c.1, Miṣr: Maktabat al-Īmān.
Abū Dāwūd, S.A. (2009), al-Sunan, Taḥqīq: Syu‘ayb al-Arnaūṭ dan Muḥammad Kāmil, c.1, Bayrūt: Dār al-Risālah al-Ālamiyyah.
Abū Zayd, B.A. (1992), Ma’rifat al-Nusakh wa al-Ṣuḥuf al-Ḥadīthiyyah, c.1, al-Riyāḍ: Dār al-Rāyah.
Al-‘Awnī, Ḥ .‘Ā. (1996), al-Manhaj al-Muqtaraḥ li Fahm al-Muṣṭalaḥ, c.1, al-Riyāḍ: Dār al-Hijrah.
Al-‘Umarī, A. Ḍ. (t.t), Mawqif al-Istisyrāq min al-Sīrah al-Nabawiyyah, al-Madīnah: al-Jāmi’ah al-Islāmiyyah.
Al-A’zhamī, M.M. (1980), Dirāsāt fi al-Ḥadīth al-Nabawī,c.1, Bayrūt: al-Maktab al-Islāmī.
Al-Bukhārī, M.I. (1993), Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, Taḥqīq: Muṣṭafā Dīb al-Bughā, c.5, Dimasyq: Dār Ibn Kathīr.
Al-Ḥakamī, Ḥ.M. (1433), Manhaj al-Muḥaddithīn fi al-Naqd, c.1, al-Riyāḍ: Dār al-Ṣamī‘ī.
Al-Khaṭīb, A. A. (t.t), al-Kifāyah fi ‘Ilm al-Riwāyah, Taḥqīq: Abū ‘Abdillāh al-Sūraqī dan Ibrāhīm Ḥamdī al-Madanī, al-Hind: Dāirat al-Ma ‘ārif al-‘Uthmāniyyah.
Al-Malabārī, Ḥ.A. (2001), al-Muwāzanah bayn al-Mutaqaddimīn wa al-Mutaakhirīn fi Taṣḥīḥ al-Aḥādīth wa Ta’līliha, c.2, Bayrūt: Dār Ibn Ḥazm.
Al-Malabārī, Ḥ.A.(2003). Nazharāt Jadīdah fi ‘Ulūm al-Ḥadīth, c.1, Bayrūt: Dār Ibn Ḥazm.
Al-Qaḥṭānī, A.A (2014). Al-Ṣaḥābah wa al-Ṣuḥbah wa Syubuhāt Ḥawl ‘Adālat al-Ṣaḥābat wa Ḍabṭihim: ‘Ard wa Naqd, c.1, al-Riyāḍ: Dār al-‘Āṣimah.
Al-Qaraḍāwī, Y.A (1992). Kayfa Nata‘āmal Ma’ al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah: Ma ‘ālim wa Ḍawābīṭ, c.5, Manṣūrah: Dār al-Wafā.
Al-Sibā‘ī, M.Ḥ. (1982), al-Sunnah wa Makānatuhā fi al-Tasyrī’ al-Islāmī, c.3, Dimasyq: al-Maktab al-Islāmi.
Al-Suyūṭī, ‘A.R. (1988), ‘Ayn al-Iṣābah fi Istidrāk ‘Āisyah ‘ala al-Ṣaḥābah, Taḥqīq: ‘Abdullāh Muḥammad al-Darwīsy, c.1, al-Qāhirah: Maktabat al-‘Ilm.
Ṭāriq, I.M. (1998). Al-Irsyādāt fi Taqwiyat al-Aḥādīth bi al-Syawāhid wa al-Mutāba‘āt, c.1, al-Qāhirah: Maktabat Ibn Taymiyyah.
Al-Tirmidzī, M. ‘I. (1996), al-Jāmi’ al-Kabīr, Taḥqīq: Bassyār ‘Awwād Ma’rūf, c.1, Bayrūt: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī.
Al-‘Umarī. A.Ḍ (1967). Buḥūth fi Tārikh al-Sunnah al-Musyarrafah, c.1, al-Madīnah: Maktabat al-‘Ulūm wa al-Ḥikam.
Al-Zarkasyī, M.A. (2001), al-Ijābah lima Istadrakathu ‘Āisyah ‘ala al-Ṣaḥābah, Taḥqīq: Rif’at Fawzī, c.1, al-Qāhirah: Maktabah Khānjī.
Ibn Ḥajr, A.A. (2000). Nuzhat al-Nazhar fi Tawḍīḥ Nukhbat al-Fikar fi Muṣṭalaḥ Aḥl al-Athar, c.3, Taḥqīq: Nūr al-Dīn ‘Itr, Dimasyq: Maṭba‘ah al-Ṣabāḥ.
Ibn Mājah, M.Y. (2009), al-Sunan, Taḥqīq: Syu’aib al-Arna‘ūṭ dan lain-lain, c.1, Bayrūt: Dār al-Risālah al-‘Ālamiyyah.
Itr, N.D (1981), Manhaj al-Naqd fi ‘Ulūm al-Ḥadīth, c.3, Dimasyq: Dār al-Fikr.
Mālik. (2004), al-Muwaṭṭa’, Taḥqīq: Muḥammad Muṣṭafā al-A’zhamī, c.1, Abū Zhabī: Muassasah Zayid Ibn Ṣulṭān Āl Nahyān.
Mu’taz, A. (2011). Radd al-Ḥadīth min Jihat al-Matn: Dirāsat fi Manāhij al-Muḥaddithīn wa al-Uṣūliyyīn, c.1, Bayrūt: al-Syabakah al-‘Arabiyyah.
Muslim. (1955), Ṣaḥīh Muslim, Taḥqīq: Muḥammad Fuād ‘Abd al-Bāqī, Bayrūt: Dār Ihyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī.
Ṭaḥḥān, M.A. (2004), Taysīr Muṣṭalaḥ al-Ḥadīth, c.10, al-Riyāḍ: Maktabat al-Ma‘ārif.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright of this article will be vested to author(s) and granted the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, unless otherwise stated.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
