Sejarah Penulisan Ilmu Sirah: Analisis Perubahan Paten Dan Landskap Historiografi Islam

The Emergence of Sirah Literature: An Analysis of Its Patents and the Development of Islamic Historiography

Authors

  • Ahmad Sanusi Azmi Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33102/johs.v7i2.208

Keywords:

Sirah, historiografi, hadith, paten

Abstract

Examining the complex nature of Islamic historiography, Robinson adduced the discourse in a tripartite typology of historical works namely as chronography, biography, and prosopography. The formative period of historical writings in the early Islamic era has been one of the interesting topics especially the development of Sirah literature. This paper aims to explore the nature of early Islamic historical writings, analyze the emergence of its literature, and examine the basic pattern of Sirah Nabawiyyah. The present study is qualitative in nature and is one in which the researcher will employ both descriptive and source-critical approaches. The study in its findings confirm that the earliest proponents of the Prophet were principally attempting biography, and were responsible, above all, for the transmission of tradition. They apparently took any narration or anecdote about the Prophet, even, on occasions, contradictory accounts. With its specific patterns, circumlocutions, and diverse emphases, in which no one part is given distinction or importance over another, the Sirah itself contains the totality of what the compilers could gather, as scrupulously as they found possible.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd al-Aziz al-Duri. (2005). Nasha’ ʿIlm al-Tārīkh ʿind al-ʿArab, Markaz Dirasat al-Wihda al-Arabiyya.

Abd al-Sabūr Marzūq. (1998) al-Sīra al-Nabawīyyah fi al-Qurʾān al-Karīm, Miṣr: al-Hai’a al-Misrīyyah al-‘ammah Li al-Kitāb.

Abu al-Qasim Abd al-Rahman al-Suhaili. (1421H) Raudh al-Unuf . Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi.

Abu al-Hasan al-Mawardi. (t.t.) al-Ahkam al-Sultaniyyah. Dar al-Hadith.

Adam, Charles J. (1997). Reflection on The Work of John Wansbrough in Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, Brill. Vol 9.

Ahmad bin Hanbal. (2002). Musnad Ahmad, Tahqiq al-Arna’ut. Muassasah al-Risalah.

Al-Baghdādī. 2002. Tārīkh Baghdād, ed. Bashshār Maʿrūf. Bayrūt: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī.

Al-Bukhari. (1422H). al-Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, ed. Muḥammad al-Nāṣir. Dār Ṭūq al-Naja.Al-Khatib al-

Al-Baghdadi, Taqyiid al-Ilmi (Beirut: Ihya al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah), 84.

Al-Ṭabarī. 2000. Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī, ed. Ahmad Shakir. Muassasa al-Risāla.

________ 1387H. Tārīkh al-Rusul wa al-Mulūk. Bayrūt: Dār al-Turāth.

Al-Tirmīdhī, Abū ʿIsā, Muḥammad ibn ʿIsā. 1998. al-Jāmi’ al-Kabīr. Bayrūt: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī.

Al-Zahabi, Al-Dhahabī, Al-Dhahabī, Shams al-Dīn Abū Abdillah Muḥammad ibn Ahmad ibn ‘Uthmān. Mizan al-I’tidal, Dar al-Ma’rifah, 1963) 1/5

Andrew Rippin. (2000). ‘Muḥammad in The Qurʾān: Reading Scripture in the 21st Century’, in H. Motzki (ed.), The Biography Of Muḥammad: The Issue Of The Sources.

Azmi, A. S. B. (2017). Crystallization Of The Quran: An Analysis Of John Wansbrough's Theory. Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama dan Sosial Budaya.

Azmi, A. S., Ismail, M. Y., Nor, Z. M., Sobali, A. M., & Halim, A. A. (2017). Qur’ānic References in Sīra Literature: A Prolegomenon to The Orientalist Studies. Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah, 12(13), 70-78.

Berg, Herbert. (2014). "The Divine Sources." The Ashgate Research Companion to Islamic Law.

Brown, Jonathan AC. (2017). Hadith: Muhammad's legacy in the medieval and modern world. Simon and Schuster.

Cook, Michael. (2000) The Koran: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press

Donner, Fred (1998). Narratives of Islamic Origins The Beginnings of Islamic Historical Writing Princeton: The Darwin Press.

Goerke A. (2011) The relationship between maghāzī and ḥadīth in early Islamic scholarship. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. 2011;74(2):171-185.

Haji Khalifah. (1941). Kashf al-Ẓunūn ‘An Asāmī al-Kutub wa al-Funūn, Maktabah al-Muthanna.

Ibn ʿAsākir, Abu al-Qasim Ali ibn al-Hasan. 1995. Tārīkh Dimashq. Ed. ‘Amr ibn Gharama. Dar al-Fikr

Ibn Faris. (1997) al-Sahabi fi Fiqh al-Lughah, Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.

Ibn Hajr. Aḥmad ibn ʿAlī. al-Asqalani. (1986) Taqrib al-Tahzib, Dar al-Rasyid.

Ibn Hajar al-‘Asqalani. (1326H) Tahzib al-Tahzib (Matba’ah Da’irah al-Ma’arif al-Nizamiyyah, 5/376

Ibn Hajr. Aḥmad ibn ʿAlī. 1379H. Fatḥ al-Bārī fī Sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Bayrūt: Dār al-Maʿrifa.

Juynboll, Gautier H.A. “Review of John Wansbrough, Quranic Studies: Sources and Methods of Scriptural Interpretation,” Journal of Semitic Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979, 24 (2), 293-296.

John Wansbrough. (1978) The Sectarian Milieu. Content and Composition of Islamic Salvation History, Oxford.

Motzki, Harald, (2006). Alternative Accounts Of The Quran’s Formation, in McAuliffe, Jane Dammen, the cambridge companion to the Quran, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Meir J. Kister, (1983) “The Sīrah literature”, in A.F.L. Beeston et al. (eds), The Cambridge History of Arabic Literature. Arabic Literature to the End of the Umayyad Period, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 352

Ibn Saʿd. 1990. Tabaqāt al-Kubrā. Bayrūt: Dār al-Kutub al-Ilmiyya.

________ (t.t). Ṭabaqāt. ed. ʿUmar ʿAlī Muḥammad. al-Qāhira: Maktaba al-Khanjī.

Muhammad Qasim Zaman. (1996). "Maghāzī and the Muḥaddithūn: Reconsidering the Treatment of “Historical” Materials in Early Collections of Hadith." International Journal of Middle East Studies 28, no. 1 (1996): 1-18.

Muhammad Mustafa Azami, (1978). Studies in Hadith Methodology and Literature, American Trust Publications.

Muhammad Mustafa Azami, (1980) Dirasat fi al-Hadith al-Nabawi wa Tarikh Tadwinuh, al-Maktab al-Islami.

Riyad Hashim dan Niḍāl Muaʿyyad, Manhajiyyah Ibn Ishaq fi Tadwin al-Sirah al-Nabawiyyah, Majallah Kuliyyah al-Ulum al-Islamiyyah, 6 (12), 31.

Serjeant, E. (1955). Jacques Ryckmans: L'institution monarchique en Arabie méridionale avant l'Islam (Ma'in et Saba) (Bibliothèque du Muséon, vol. XXVIII). xxiii, 368 pp. Louvain: Presses Universitaires and Institut Orientaliste, 1951, 400 fr. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 17(1), 167-168. doi:10.1017/S0041977X00106433

Published

2022-12-01
CITATION
DOI: 10.33102/johs.v7i2.208
Published: 2022-12-01

How to Cite

Azmi, A. S. (2022). Sejarah Penulisan Ilmu Sirah: Analisis Perubahan Paten Dan Landskap Historiografi Islam: The Emergence of Sirah Literature: An Analysis of Its Patents and the Development of Islamic Historiography. Journal Of Hadith Studies, 7(2), 105-118. https://doi.org/10.33102/johs.v7i2.208

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>